Portland Cement Zambia Ownership After Court Of Appeal’s Decision Remains Unchanged

As per the latest decision from the Supreme Court on the appeal from the Ventriglia, it is now a confirmed news that Dr. Rajan Lekhraj Mahtani is the majority shareholder and legal owner of the factory. This confirmation was invariable after the Ventriglia family suddenly decided to appeal against the verdict of Court of Appeal on the Portland Cement Zambia case. Dr. Rajan Mahtani is a noted businessman in Zambia who has been working tirelessly towards establishing an authentic and transparent business empire. Some of his top companies in Zambia are Mahtani Group of Companies, Finsbury Investments and Finance Bank Zambia. In the year 2006-07, Finsbury Investments received majority shareholding and ownership of Portland Cement Zambia with the objective of developing the factory and completing the construction. However, all these growth plans were halted when the Ventriglia family decided to challenge the shareholding agreement according to which Finsbury Investments was owner of Portland Cement. This started a significant court battle at the Lusaka High Court lasting for more than a decade. Despite this long pendency, the final verdict which came on 31st January 2019 was controversial as justice Nkonde of Lusaka High Court announced Ventriglias as the only shareholders of the Portland Cement Zambia.

Dr. Rajan Lekhraj Mahtani was able to successfully challenge this decision at the higher Court of Appeal. On 31st January 2019, justice Mwinde on behalf of the higher Court of Appeal gave the final decision that the verdict from the Lusaka High Court was misdirected and must be reversed. Furthermore, justice Mwinde confirmed that Dr. Rajan Mahtani owned Finsbury Investments should remain the majority shareholder and legal owner of the factory. After more than a year of this verdict, the Ventriglia family challenged it by claiming it to be false. It was challenged at the Supreme Court Zambia. After detailed evaluation, the Supreme Court bench concluded that the claim from the Ventriglia family was invalid and therefore, was effectively rejected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *